UFOs on Capitol Hill

UFOs on Capitol Hill July 26, 2023

UFOs on Capitol Hill

SR 1175 UFO 5. UFOs on Capitol Hill on July 26, 2023

Today’s ‘historic’ hearing before the U.S. House of Representatives Oversight Committee on national security listened to testimony as credible as it is sensational. The momentary heroes were two Navy pilots—David Fravor and Ryan Graves—along with former intelligence officer—David Grusch. Commenting on New Nation, UFO researcher Nike Pope exclaimed that now, finally, national security and flight safety have become public issues. I found this exciting, to be sure. But, is it promising?

CBS. (L-R) Ryan Graves, Executive Director of Americans for Safe Aerospace, David Grusch, former National Reconnaissance Officer Representative on the Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Task Force, and Retired Commander David Fravor, former Commanding Officer in the US Navy, are sworn in to testify during a House Subcommittee on National Security, the Border, and Foreign Affairs hearing titled “Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Implications on National Security Public Safety and Government Transparency,” on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, on July 26, 2023. (Photo by Brendan SMIALOWSKI / AFP) (Photo by BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images)

Yes, the U.S. government houses empirical evidence that earth’s skies are being roamed by an advanced technology that just might come from NHI (Non-Human Intelligence).

Yes, the U.S. government possess extraterrestrial spacecraft and is reverse engineering the technology.

Yes, the U.S. government is keeping this knowledge secret.

Yes, our U.S. congressional representatives are now so riled up that they plan to uncover the secrets and make transparent to the public what the government knows. More dangerous than the UAP (Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena) is government secrecy about UAP.

Does this mean we’ll finally attain disclosure?

Naysayers such as Mick West of Scientific American complain that, despite the excitement on Capitol Hill, we still have not seen the evidence.

The Pentagon pushed back against the whistleblowers, saying this testimony was “insulting.” Is that a good sign?

Disclosure of UFOs on Capitol Hill

Disclosure is the word shouted for decades by Steven Greer and other UFO afficionados pestering Uncle Sam for information.

Will disclosure now take place? Or will the Pentagon bar the door to keep Congress out?

What can we forecast about disclosure of UFOs on Capitol Hill?

The hopefuls among us deem this event “historic” and believe the “genie cannot be put back into the bottle” (George Knapp). The dam is about to break! Information will now flow like Niagara Falls. Right?

I have hope. But I don’t have expectation.

Major General John A. Samford press conference to explain UFOs buzzing Whitehouse in July 1952

We’ve been at this point many times over the last 75 years. Recall the August 1952 press conference with Major General John A. Samford’s to address the flap of flying saucers flying over the nation’s capitol between July 19 and 27 of that year. Or recall the decade and a half work of Project Bluebook by the U.S. Air Force. Or recall Representative Gerald Ford’s funding of what would become the Condon Report in 1969. In every case no revelations of what the public expected took place.

Will today’s attention of UFOs on Capitol Hill be different? Will something finally happen?

My forecast is negative. Why? Because we the people do not actually want disclosure. At the preconscious level, we want to believe that the U.S. military is virtually omnipotent. We want to believe that the Pentagon has received technological revelations that have descended from the heavens that give America preeminence in the skies.

Our ascription of secret knowledge having fallen from heaven provides symbolic comfort. In short, the outcry for disclosure is an oblique form of respect if not worship of the Pentagon.

Now, you may say, “Ted! That’s so extreme! Even outrageous.”

Well, let me remind you that this myth—myth understood as a framework for interpretation—has remained virtually constant since July 1947, the month of the Roswell UFO crash. How else might this virtually unchanged tug-of-war over disclosure be explained?

Imagine this scenario.

“Alien” David Penfound

Imagine the following scenario. The Pentagon opens its door so that all UFO researchers and congressional lawmakers can enter and examine all previously classified evidence. And imagine that after full examination there are no aliens.

What do you predict would happen? I submit that the disclosure investigators would complain: but you must still be hiding something!

In short, the disclosure demand is a bottomless pit.

Conclusion

UFOs on Capitol Hill. What a great day! I loved it.

What next? Will disclosure finally take place? Sorry. I have my doubts.

Now, I hope I’m wrong about this.

More on UFOs on Capitol Hill

Are alien scientists the real gods?

Are UFOs Real? A Sea Change?

Would confirmation of extraterrestrial life cause a crisis for terrestrial religion?

UFO Whistleblowing

UFOs and Atomic Weaponry

Are UFOs demnic?

For more on this book, click here.

Ted Peters directs traffic at the intersection of science, religion, and ethics. Peters is an emeritus professor at the Graduate Theological Union, where he co-edits the journal, Theology and Science, with Robert John Russell on behalf of the Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, in Berkeley, California, USA. He authored Playing God? Genetic Determinism and Human Freedom? (Routledge, 2nd ed., 2002) as well as Science, Theology, and Ethics (Ashgate 2003). Along with Martinez Hewlett, Joshua Moritz, and Robert John Russell, he co-edited, Astrotheology: Science and Theology Meet Extraterrestrial Intelligence (2018). Along with Octavio Chon Torres, Joseph Seckbach, and Russell Gordon, he co-edited, Astrobiology: Science, Ethics, and Public Policy (Scrivener 2021). He is also author of UFOs: God’s Chariots? Spirituality, Ancient Aliens, and Religious Yearnings in the Age of Extraterrestrials (Career Press New Page Books, 2014). Look for his newest book, The Voice of Public Theology, a collection of previous articles. See his website: TedsTimelyTake.com.

Ted is former Louisiana State Director of investigations for MUFON (Mutual UFO Network) and currently is a member of SCU (Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies).

About Ted Peters
Ted Peters directs traffic at the intersection of science, religion, and ethics. Peters is an emeritus professor at the Graduate Theological Union, where he co-edits the journal, Theology and Science, with Robert John Russell on behalf of the Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, in Berkeley, California, USA. He authored Playing God? Genetic Determinism and Human Freedom? (Routledge, 2nd ed., 2002) as well as Science, Theology, and Ethics (Ashgate 2003). Along with Martinez Hewlett, Joshua Moritz, and Robert John Russell, he co-edited, Astrotheology: Science and Theology Meet Extraterrestrial Intelligence (2018). Along with Octavio Chon Torres, Joseph Seckbach, and Russell Gordon, he co-edited, Astrobiology: Science, Ethics, and Public Policy (Scrivener 2021). He is also author of UFOs: God's Chariots? Spirituality, Ancient Aliens, and Religious Yearnings in the Age of Extraterrestrials (Career Press New Page Books, 2014). Look for his newest book, The Voice of Public Theology, a collection of previous articles. See his website: TedsTimelyTake.com. Ted is former Louisiana State Director of investigations for MUFON (Mutual UFO Network) and currently is a member of SCU (Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies). You can read more about the author here.

Browse Our Archives